Soil DNA Isolation Plus Kit
For the detection of microorganisms from soil samples
For research use only and NOT intended for in vitro diagnostics.
For the detection of microorganisms from soil samples
For research use only and NOT intended for in vitro diagnostics.
For the detection of microorganisms from soil samples
Register today to receive an exclusive 15% off* on your first order.
Norgen's Soil DNA Isolation Plus Kit provides a convenient and rapid method for the detection of microorganisms from soil samples. All types of soil samples can be processed with this kit, including common soil samples and difficult soil samples with high humic acid content such as compost and manure. The kit removes all traces of humic acid and PCR inhibitors using the provided the OSR (Organic Substance Removal) Solution. A simple and rapid spin column procedure is then used to further purify the DNA. Total genomic DNA can be isolated and purified from all the various microorganisms found in soil, such as bacteria, fungi and algae. The purified DNA is of the highest quality and is fully compatible with downstream PCR applications, as all humic acid substances and PCR inhibitors are removed during the isolation.
Kit Specifications
|
|
Maximum Soil Input |
250 mg
|
Type of Soil Processed |
All soil types
|
Maximum Column Binding Capacity |
50 μg
|
Maximum Column Loading Volume |
650 μL
|
Time to Complete 10 Purifications |
30 minutes
|
Storage Conditions and Product Stability
All solutions should be kept tightly sealed and stored at room temperature. This kit is stable for 1 year from the date of shipment.
Component | Cat. 64000 (50 preps) |
---|---|
Lysis Buffer D | 45 mL |
Lysis Additive A | 2 x 6 mL |
Binding Buffer I | 7 mL |
OSR Solution | 3 mL |
Lysis Buffer QP | 25 mL |
Wash Solution A | 18 mL |
Elution Buffer B | 8 mL |
Bead B Tubes | 50 |
Spin Columns | 50 |
Collection Tubes | 50 |
Elution Tubes (1.7 mL) | 50 |
Product Insert | 1 |
Poor DNA recovery could be due to one or more of the following:
Depending on the type of soil, further vortexing with the flat bed vortex or bead beater equipment may be required. However, it is not recommended to increase the vortex time to longer than 10 minutes at maximum speed.
Ensure that the provided Lysis Additive A is added to separate humic acid and increase DNA yield.
Ensure that 400 µL of Lysis Buffer QP and 550 µL of 96-100% ethanol are added to the lysate before binding to the column.
Ensure that 42 mL of 96-100% ethanol is added to the supplied Wash Solution A prior to use.
If the DNA does not perform well in downstream applications, it may be due to one or more of the following:
The elution contains high humic acids. Ensure that the OSR Solution was added to the clean lysate. Also, ensure the column was washed with Binding Buffer B.
Traces of humic acids or salt from the binding step may remain in the sample if the column is not washed with the provided Binding Buffer B and Wash Solution A. Humic acids and salt may interfere with downstream applications, and thus must be washed from the column.
Ensure that the dry spin under the Column Wash procedure is performed in order to remove traces of ethanol prior to elution. Ethanol is known to interfere with many downstream applications.
Take steps to optimize the PCR conditions being used, including varying the amount of template (10 ng to 50 ng for 20 µL of PCR reaction is recommended), changing the source of Taq polymerase, looking into the primer design, and adjusting the annealing conditions.
Title | Metagenomic Influential Insights in the Formation of Biogenic Iron Hydroxysulfate Precipitates by Ferrous Oxidative Microbial Consortia |
Citation | Geomicrobiology Journal 2023. |
Authors | Daladier M. Castilo, Jesus P. Medina, Francisco Gamarra, Sandra Delgado, Virginia Chipana, Claudia Clavijo, Robert Ccorahua-Santo and Mesalina Peceros-Melchor |
Title | Molecular identification of Acanthamoeba spp., Balamuthia mandrillaris and Naegleria fowleri in soil samples using quantitative real-time PCR assay in Turkey; Hidden danger in the soil! |
Citation | Acta Tropica 2023. |
Authors | Mehmet Aykur a b, Hande Dagci b |
Title | Startup performance and microbial communities of a decentralized anaerobic digestion of food waste |
Citation | Chemosphere 2023. |
Authors | Yong Wei Tiong, Pooja Sharma, Hailin Tian, To-Hung Tsui, Heng Thong Lam, Yen Wah Tong, |
Title | Systematic screening of carbon-based anode materials for bioelectrochemical systems |
Citation | Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology 2023. |
Authors | Zainab Ul, Pilar Sánchez-Peña, Mireia Baeza, Mira Sulonen, David Gabriel, Juan Antonio Baeza, Albert Guisasola |
Title | A Comparison of Performance between Two Anaerobic Biodigesters Configurations for Biogas Production. |
Citation | Revista Técnica Energía 2018. |
Authors | Ramirez-Perez, J. C. (2018) |