Fungi/Yeast Genomic DNA Isolation Kits
For the rapid purification of DNA from yeast cells and fungal spores or mycelium
For research use only and NOT intended for in vitro diagnostics.
Fungi/Yeast Genomic DNA Isolation Kits
For the rapid purification of DNA from yeast cells and fungal spores or mycelium
Register today to receive an exclusive 15% off* on your first order.
Features and Benefits
- Rapid spin column purification of genomic DNA from viable yeast cells, fungal spores or mycelium, and bacteria including Gram-positive
- Bead tubes (provided) allow for effective mechanical homogenization
- Purified DNA is of high quality and integrity and compatible with any sensitive downstream applications such as PCR, qPCR, RFLP and more
These kits provide fast and reliable procedures for the purification of genomic DNA from viable yeast cells, fungal spores or mycelium, and bacteria including Gram-positive. Genomic DNA is efficiently extracted from the cells by a combination of heat treatment, detergents and Bead Tubes (provided). An optional lyticase treatment allows for improved DNA yields with certain fungal and yeast species. Recovered genomic DNA is of excellent yield and purity for any downstream application including PCR, qPCR, Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP), sequencing, SNP analysis and more.
Fungi/Yeast Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Spin Column)
This kit provides rapid spin column purification of genomic DNA from viable yeast cells, fungal spores or mycelium, and bacteria including Gram-positive. Preparation time for a single sample is less then 30 minutes, and each kit contains sufficient materials for 50 preparations.
Fungi/Yeast Genomic DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (HT)
Norgen’s Fungi/Yeast Genomic DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit provides a fast, reliable and simple procedure for high throughput isolation of DNA from viable yeast cells, fungal spores or mycelium and Gram-positive bacteria. The purification could be performed on either a vacuum manifold or using centrifugation. Complete 96 purifications in 40 minutes.
Details
Supporting Data
Kit Specifications
|
|
Column Binding Capacity |
50 μg
|
Maximum Column Loading Volume |
650 μL
|
Maximum Amount of Starting Material: Fungi (wet weight) Yeast or Bacteria Culture |
50 mg 0.5mL - 1mL |
Average Yield* Pichia sp. (yeast) Botrytis cinerea Fusarium sp. Aspergillis niger Mucor racemosus Cladosporium cladosporioides Penicillium sp. Rhizopus oryzae Alternaria tenuissima |
25 μg 32 μg 42 μg 26 μg 15 μg 12 μg 40 μg 7 μg 30 μg |
Time to Complete 10 purifications |
30 minutes
|
* Yield will vary depending on the type of sample processed
Storage Conditions and Product Stability
All solutions should be kept tightly sealed and stored at room temperature. This kit is stable for 1 year after the date of shipment.
Component | Cat. 27300 (50 preps) | Cat. 27350 (192 preps) |
---|---|---|
Lysis Buffer L | 30 mL | 2 x 60 mL |
Resuspension Solution A | 20 mL | 60 mL |
Solution BX | 28 mL | 2 x 28 mL |
Wash Solution A | 18 mL | 2 x 38 mL |
Elution Buffer B | 15 mL | 30 mL |
Bead Tubes | 50 | 200 |
Spin Columns | 50 | - |
Collection Tubes | 50 | - |
96-Well Plate | - | 2 |
96-Well Collection Plate | - | 2 |
Adhesive Tape | - | 4 |
Elution Tubes (1.7 mL) | 50 | - |
96-Well Elution Plate | - | 2 |
Product Insert | 1 | 1 |
Documentation
FAQs
Spin Column, High Throughput
Clogged columns/wells may occur due to the sample being too large:
- Too many cells were applied to the column.
Ensure that the amount of cells used is less than 1 x 108 viable yeast cells or 50 mg (wet weight) of fungal culture. Clogging can be alleviated by increasing the g-force and/or centrifuging for a longer period of time until the lysate passes through the column.
Turbidity in elution may be due to the sample being too large:
- Depending on fungi species, sometimes turbidity can be observed in the elution. This may inhibit downstream applications. Reduce the amount of cells used, and perform a third wash during the Wash step.
If the DNA does not perform well in downstream applications, it may be due to one or more of the following:
- The sample is too large.
Too many cells were applied to the column. Ensure that the amount of cells used is less than 1 x 108 viable yeast/bacterial cells or 50 mg (wet weight) of fungal culture.
- Ethanol carryover.
Ensure that the dry spin under the Column Wash procedure is performed in order to remove traces of ethanol prior to elution. Ethanol is known to interfere with many downstream applications.
- The columns/wells were not washed twice with the provided Wash Solution A.
Traces of salt from the binding step may remain in the sample if the column is not washed twice with the Wash Solution A. Salt may interfere with downstream applications, and thus must be washed from the column.
- PCR reaction conditions need to be optimized.
Take steps to optimize the PCR conditions being used, including varying the amount of template (20 ng to 50 ng for 20 µL of PCR reaction), changing the source of Taq polymerase, adding BSA (final concentration is 0.1 µg/µL), looking into the primer design, and adjusting the annealing conditions.
Citations
Title | "INNOVATION AND ENHANCEMENT OF ALMOND PROCESSING CHAIN", A PROJECT TO HIGHLIGHT THE ALMOND DRIED FRUIT QUALITY IN SICILY (SOUTH ITALY) |
Citation | ISHS Acta Horticulturae 2023. |
Authors | C. Oliveri, D. Scalone, G. Muratore, G. Spagna , R. La Rosa |
Title | A Pipeline to Investigate Fungal-Fungal Interactions: Trichoderma Isolates against Plant-Associated Fungi |
Citation | Journal of Fungi 2023. |
Authors | Marianna Dourou and Caterina Anna Maria La Porta |
Title | Biocontrol of root knot nematodes by endophytic fungus isolated from garlic |
Citation | Scientia Horticulturae 2023. |
Authors | Aimal Khan a, Anwar Hussain a, Farman Ali b, Muhammad Hamayun a, Amjad Iqbal c, Hosam O. Elansary d, Ho-youn Kim |
Title | Characterization of some efficient cellulase producing bacteria isolated from paper mill sludges and organic fertilizers |
Citation | Int J Biochem Mol Biol 2011;2(2):146-154 2023. |
Authors | Miranda L Maki1,2, Michael Broere2, Kam Tin Leung2, Wensheng Qin1,2 |
Title | Distribution of Species of Dermatophyte Among Patients at a Dermatology Centre of Nghean Province, Vietnam, 2015-2016 |
Citation | Mycopathologia 2023. |
Authors | Do, N. A., Nguyen, T. D., Nguyen, K. L., & Le, T. A. (2017). |
Title | Effective method for the heat inactivation of Blastomyces dermatitidis |
Citation | Medical Mycology 2023. |
Authors | EM Brown, LR McTaggart, DE Low, SE Richardson |
Title | Engineered Production of Tryprostatins in E. coli through Reconstitution of a Partial ftm Biosynthetic Gene Cluster from Aspergillus sp |
Citation | Jacobs J Biotechnol Bioeng. 2023. |
Authors | Gopitkumar R Shah1,#, Shane R. Wesener1,#, and Yi-Qiang Cheng |
Title | Establishment of invasive and non-invasive reporter systems to investigate American elm-Ophiostoma novo-ulmi interactions |
Citation | Fungal Genetics and Biology 2023. |
Authors | S Sherif, AMP Jones, MR Shukla, PK Saxena |
Title | Fungal Presence in Selected Tree Nuts and Dried Fruits |
Citation | Microbiology Insights 2023. |
Authors | VH Tournas, NS Niazi, JS Kohn |
Title | Identification and Antifungal susceptibility of Rhodotorula mucilaginosa isolated from women patients in Erbil City-Iraq Kurdistan |
Citation | ibero-americal journal of biotechnology and life sciences 2023. |
Authors | Nareen Qadr FaqeAbdulla |