DNA Gel Extraction Kit
For rapid extraction of DNA from agarose gel fragments
For research use only and NOT intended for in vitro diagnostics.
DNA Gel Extraction Kit
For rapid extraction of DNA from agarose gel fragments
Overview
- Fast and easy recovery of DNA from agarose gel fragments
- High recovery of desired DNA
- Convenient spin column format
- DNA is ready for ligation, restriction digestion, sequencing and more
This kit is designed for the rapid preparation and purification of DNA fragments that have been fractionated on agarose gels. The recovered DNA is free from agarose and other impurities, and is compatible with restriction enzyme digestion, ligation into vectors and sequencing. The protocol can be completed in 20 minutes.
Details
Supporting Data
Kit Specifications
|
|
Column Binding Capacity
|
10 μg
|
Maximum Weight of Gel Slice
|
400 mg
|
Average Recovery
|
70-90%
|
Size of DNA Purified |
100 - 15,000 bp
|
Minimum Elution Volume |
30 μL
|
Time to Complete 10 Purifications |
30 minutes
|
Storage Conditions and Product Stability
All solutions should be kept tightly sealed and stored at room temperature. This kit is stable for 1 year after the date of shipment.
Component | Cat. 13100 (50 preps) |
---|---|
Binding Buffer G | 80 mL |
Wash Solution A | 12 mL |
Elution Buffer B | 8 mL |
Spin Columns | 50 |
Collection Tubes | 50 |
Elution Tubes (1.7 mL) | 50 |
Product Insert | 1 |
Documentation
FAQs
Spin Column
Poor DNA recovery could be due to one of the following factors:
- pH of the electrophoresis buffer was too high.
Ensure that a fresh running buffer is used for electrophoresis. When the buffer is re-used, it often exhibits increased pH and may subsequently reduce yields.
- Gel slice was not completely melted in the Binding Buffer G.
The gel slice should be incubated at 55°C until completely dissolved. The slice should be vortexed every 2 to 3 minutes to assist dissolving.
- Isopropanol was not added prior to binding.
Ensure that 1 gel volume of Isopropanol is added to the melted gel slice prior to binding to the column.
- The appropriate amount of ethanol was not added to the Wash Solution A.
The Wash Solution A has been specifically designed to contain the appropriate amount of components. Ensure that the Wash Solution A was prepared with the correct amount of 96-100% ethanol.
- Binding of DNA to the column was inefficient.
Binding of the DNA is dependent on both pH and salt concentration. Ensure that an appropriate amount of Binding Buffer G was used for the weight of the gel slice.
- Binding Buffer G was not completely removed in the wash step.
Traces of salt left on the column from the binding step may interfere with the elution of the DNA. Ensure that the column is washed with the Wash Solution A.
- Proper Elution Buffer B was not used.
The provided Elution Buffer B has been optimized for high elution recoveries. If water or TE buffer is used instead, ensure the pH is around 8.
- Elution Buffer B was not placed directly onto the column bed.
It is important that the Elution Buffer B be placed directly onto the column bed, as this helps to increase recovery by ensuring an even passing of the buffer through the column. Do not pipette the Elution Buffer B onto the side of the column.
Presence of impurities from the sample or the protocol can affect performance of DNA in downstream applications. This can happen when:
- Removal of Wash Solution A is incomplete.
Ensure that the column is spun for 2 minutes during the wash step, in order to completely dry the column. Traces of Wash Solution A may remain in the eluted sample otherwise, and interfere with subsequent enzymatic reactions.
- DNA was not washed with the provided Wash Solution A.
Traces of salt from the binding step may remain in the sample if the column is not washed with Wash Solution A. Salt may interfere with downstream applications, and thus must be washed from the column.
Citations
Title | Differences in Gene Expression of Pear Selections Showing Leaf Curling or Leaf Reddening Symptoms Due to Pear Decline Phytoplasma |
Journal | Plants (Basel). 2022. |
Authors | Mina Kaviani, Paul H Goodwin, David M Hunter |
Title | High genetic diversity of human rhinovirus among pilgrims with acute respiratory tract infections during the 2019 Hajj pilgrimage season |
Journal | International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2022 |
Authors | Sherif A.El-Kafrawy, Salma M.Alsayed, Thamir A.Alandijany, Leena H.Bajrai, Arwa A.Faizo, Hessa A.Al-Sharif, Ahmed M.Hassan, Khalid M.Alquthami, Jaffar A.Al-Tawfiq, AlimuddinZumla, Esam I.Azhar |
Title | Thrombopoietin Secretion by Human Ovarian Cancer Cells |
Journal | International Journal of Cell Biology. 2017 |
Authors | Samaher Besbes, Shahid Shah, Iman Al-dybiat, Shahsoltan Mirshahi, Helene Helfer, Haythem Najah, Caroline Fourgeaud, Marc Pocard, Ibtissem Ghedira, Jeannette Soria, and Massoud Mirshahi |
Title | Expression analyses of some Beauveria bassiana genes in response to cuticles of four different insects |
Journal | Journal of Crop Protection. 2015. |
Authors | Masoumeh Kordi, Naser Farrokhi, Abolfazl Masoudi, Ali Derakhshan Shadmehri and Shahrokh Gharanjik |
Title | Host Exopolysaccharide Quantity and Composition Impact Erwinia amylovora Bacteriophage Pathogenesis. |
Journal | Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2013. |
Authors | Roach DR, Sjaarda DR, Castle AJ, Svircev AM. |
Title | Natural occurrence of entomopathogenic nematode species (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) in cotton fields of Tamil Nadu, India. |
Journal | Journal of Natural History. 2012. |
Authors | Seenivasana N, Prabhub S, Makeshc S, Sivakumara M. |
Title | Isolation and characterization of superior rumen bacteria of cattle (Bos taurus) and potential application in animal feedstuff. |
Journal | Open Journal of Animal Sciences. 2012. |
Authors | Krushna Chandra Das, Wensheng Qin. |