Stool DNA Isolation Kits
For the rapid and simple purification of bacterial and host DNA from stool and fecal samples.
For research use only and NOT intended for in vitro diagnostics.
CE-IVDR marked diagnostic version available here
Powered by Bioz Stool DNA Isolation Kits
For the rapid and simple purification of bacterial and host DNA from stool and fecal samples.
Overview
- Simultaneous isolation of both host DNA and microbial DNA (universal protocol)
- Fully compatible with Norgen's Stool Nucleic Acid Collection and Transport Tubes
- Eliminates PCR inhibitors including humic acids
- High quality DNA for sensitive downstream applications including PCR, qPCR, Sequencing and microarray
- 96-Well and Magnetic Bead System formats also available
These kits provide a convenient and rapid method to isolate total DNA from fresh, frozen and preserved stool samples, including those preserved using Norgen’s Stool Nucleic Acid Collection and Preservation Tubes (Cat. 45660). The universal protocol conveniently allows for the isolation of total genomic DNA from all the various microorganisms and host cells found in the stool sample simultaneously. Purifies the DNA with high yields and molecular weights of up to 50 kb plus. The purified DNA can be used with a number of downstream applications.
Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Spin Column)
Universal method to detect microorganism and host cell DNA simultaneously in stool samples. Eliminates PCR inhibitors including all traces of humic acid using a combination of chemical and physical homogenization and lysis. A simple and rapid spin column procedure is then used to further purify the DNA. The purified DNA is of the highest quality and is fully compatible with all downstream applications such as PCR, qPCR, NGS and microarrays since all humic acid substances and other PCR inhibitors are removed during the isolation process.
Stool DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (High Throughput)
Fast and easy high throughput processing using centrifugation. Eliminates PCR inhibitors including all traces of humic acid using a combination of chemical and physical homogenization and lysis. A simple and rapid spin column procedure is then used to further purify the DNA. The purified DNA is of the highest quality and is fully compatible with all downstream applications such as PCR, qPCR, NGS and microarrays since all humic acid substances and other PCR inhibitors are removed during the isolation process.
Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System)
Fast and easy processing using a magnetic bead system. Robust lysis system (chemical lysis combined with a mechanical homogenization).
Stool DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (High Throughput Magnetic Bead System)
This kit provides fast and easy processing using a magnetic bead system, and a robust lysis system (chemical lysis combined with a mechanical homogenization). High throughput and compatible with an automation robotic system.
Free Download
Extracting Biological Insights from Stool
Tips and tricks for isolating high yield and quality DNA, RNA, miRNA and EV's from fecal samples
Download for FreeDetails
Supporting Data
Figure 1. Higher Yields of DNA than Competitor Q. Stool DNA was isolated from 200 mg of fresh or preserved stool samples using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation Kit and Competitor Q's Kit. For evaluation, 10 µL of DNA from the elution was run on 1X TAE 1.2% agarose gel. Norgen's kit isolated much higher yields of DNA. *Stool was collected using Norgen’s Stool Nucleic Acid Collection and Preservation tubes (Cat. 45660). Marker = Norgen’s HighRanger DNA Ladder (Cat. 11900).
Figure 2. Stool DNA quality and concentration measured by NanoDrop. High DNA concentration and quality was obtained using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation Kit from fresh or preserved stool samples. Figure 2A: Fresh stool samples, Figure 2B: Preserved stool using Norgen’s Stool Nucleic Acid Collection and Preservation Tubes (Cat. 45660).
Figure 3. Detection of 16S rRNA from stool DNA isolated from 200 mg of fresh stool samples using Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation Kit and Competitor Q’s kit. DNA quality was confirmed by Real-time PCR using 2 µL of stool DNA (total PCR reaction volume was 20 µL) to detect 16S rRNA from different microorganisms in the stool samples. The earlier Ct value with Norgen's DNA samples (blue lines) compared to Competitor Q’s samples (red lines) indicated a higher quality of stool DNA for downstream applications. Figure 3A: Fresh stool sample, Figure 3B: Preserved stool using Norgen’s Stool Nucleic Acid Collection and Preservation Tubes (Cat. 45660).
Figure 4. Detection of 5S rRNA from the Stool DNA isolated from 200 mg of fresh stool samples using Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation Kit and Competitor Q’s Kit. DNA quality was confirmed by Real-time PCR using 2 µL of stool DNA (total PCR reaction volume was 20 µL) to detect 5S rRNA from eukaryotic DNA in the stool samples. The earlier Ct value with Norgen's DNA samples (blue lines) compared to Competitor Q’s samples (red lines) indicated a higher quality of stool DNA for downstream applications. Figure 4A: Fresh stool sample, Figure 4B: Preserved stool using Norgen’s Stool Nucleic Acid Collection and Preservation Tubes (Cat. 45660).
Figure 5. Better 16S rRNA detection from DNA isolated using Norgen’s Stool DNA Preservative and Stool DNA Isolation Kit. Two microlitres of stool DNA was used in a 20 µL PCR reaction volume. Stool was preserved using Norgen’s Stool DNA Preservative and isolated using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation Kit showed better 16S rRNA gene detection as compared to fresh stool isolated with Competitor Q.
Figure 6. Distribution of 10 Different Fecal Microbiomes. A) Principal Coordinate Analysis of 10 fecal microbiomes showing differences in the distribution of taxonomic classifications between samples up to class level. B) Hierarchical clustering of 10 fecal microbiomes based on genus-level classifications, including a bar chart showing the relative abundance of genus-level classifications for each sample in the dendrogram.
Figure 7. High Quality DNA Isolated from Preserved Stool Samples. DNA was isolated from 200 µL preserved stool samples using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System).For evaluation, 10 µL from 75 µL of elution were run on 1X TAE 1.2% agarose gel. Stool samples were preserved in Norgen’s Stool Nucleic Acid Collection and Transport Tubes (Cat. 45630, 45660). M = Norgen’s HighRanger DNA Ladder (Cat. 11900).
Figure 8. Comparison of A260/280 and A260/230 ratios. DNA was isolated from 200 mg stool samples using Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) and Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation Kit (column format). The purified DNA was then compared for A260/280 and A260/230 ratios. DNA isolated using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) (A, B and C) showed a comparable DNA quality to the DNA isolated using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation (Column method), indicating the consistence and highest DNA quality were generated by the Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System).
Figure 9. High Quality DNA confirmed by Real-time PCR. DNA was isolated from 200 mg stool using Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) and Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation Kit (column format). The quality of the purified DNA was evaluated by using 8 μL of stool DNA (total PCR reaction volume was 20 µL) to detect 16S rRNA from the different stool samples. No PCR inhibition was observed from DNA isolated using Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) (blue circles), similar to the DNA isolated using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Column method) (red circles), indicating the excellent isolation consistency and the quality of the stool DNA for downstream applications.
Figure 10. 16S Metagenomics data generated by Illumina MiSeq. Stool DNA was isolated using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) from 200 mg of stool from healthy donors, and the stool microbiomes were successfully sequenced by Illumina MiSeq.
Figure 11. High Quality DNA Isolated from Preserved Stool Samples. DNA was isolated from 200 µL preserved stool samples using Norgen’s Stool DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (Magnetic Bead System). For evaluation, 10 µL from 75 µL of elution were run on 1X TAE 1.2% agarose gel. M = Norgen’s HighRanger DNA Ladder (Cat. 11900).
Figure 12. High Quality DNA Confirmed by Real-Time PCR. DNA was isolated from 200 mg stool using Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (Magnetic Bead System). The quality of the purified DNA was evaluated by using 2 µL of stool DNA (total PCR reaction volume was 20 µL) to detect 16S rRNA from the stool sample. No PCR inhibition was observed from DNA isolated using Norgen's Stool DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (Magnetic Bead System) indicating the excellent isolation consistency and the high quality of the stool DNA for downstream applications.
|
Kit Specifications
|
|
|
Binding Capacity Per Well
|
50 μg
|
| Maximum Loading Volume Per Well |
500 μL
|
| Size of DNA Purified | All sizes |
|
Maximum Amount of Starting Material: |
200 μg 400 μL |
| Time to Complete 96 Purifications |
60 minutes
|
Storage Conditions and Product Stability
All solutions should be kept tightly sealed and stored at room temperature. This kit is stable for 1 year after the date of shipment.
| Component | Cat. 27600 (50 preps) | Cat. 65600 (192 preps) | Cat. 55700 (50 preps) | Cat. 63100 (192 preps) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lysis Buffer L | 60 mL | 2 x 105 mL | 60 mL | 3 x 60 mL 1 x 30 mL |
| Lysis Additive A | 6 mL | 25 mL | 6 mL | 25 mL |
| Binding Buffer I | 7 mL | 25 mL | 7 mL | 25 mL |
| Binding Buffer C | 30 mL | 110 mL | - | - |
| Wash Solution A | 18 mL | 2 x 38 mL | - | - |
| Magnetic Bead Suspension | - | - | 1.1 mL | 4 x 1.1 mL |
| Solution WN | - | - | 18 mL | 55 mL |
| Elution Buffer B | 8 mL | 30 mL | 8 mL | 30 mL |
| Bead Tubes | 50 | 200 | 50 | 196 |
| Mini Spin Columns | 50 | - | - | - |
| 96-Well Plate | - | 2 | - | 2 |
| Adhesive Tape | - | 4 | - | 2 |
| Collection Tubes | 50 | - | - | - |
| 96-Well Collection Plate | - | 2 | - | - |
| Elution Tubes (1.7 mL) | 50 | - | 50 | - |
| 96-Well Elution Plate | - | 2 | - | 2 |
| Product Insert | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Automation
Stool DNA Automated Isolation Tutorial
Supplementary Protocol
Supplementary Protocol - Automated Procedure for Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System)
Documentation
(65600) Stool DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (High Throughput) - Protocol (2x96-Well)
(55700) Stool DNA Isolation Kit (Magnetic Bead System) - Protocol (50 prep)
(63100) Stool DNA Isolation 96-Well Kit (High Throughput Magnetic Bead System) - Protocol (2 x 96-well)
Detection of Viral, Bacterial and Human Genomic DNA from Preserved Stool Samples
The Isolation of High Quality Stool DNA and its Application to Quantitative Adenovirus Detection using TaqMan® Real-Time PCR
Comparison of Stool DNA Isolation Methods for Bacterial and Mammalian DNA Detection
Determination of the DNA Molecular Weight (MW) from different Norgen Columns and Isolation Methods
Immediate Viral Inactivation Using Norgen’s Stool Nucleic Acid Preservative
Gut Microbiome Diversity: Comparison of Stool DNA Preservation Methods
Comparative Microbiome Profiles from Fecal Preservation Methods
Automation of Stool DNA Isolation on the Hamilton Vantage Using Norgen’s Magnetic Bead Stool Isolation Kit
FAQs
Spin Column
Poor DNA recovery could be due to one or more of the following:
- Homogenization was incomplete.
Depending on the type of stool, further vortexing with the flat bed vortex or bead beater equipment may be required. However, it is not recommended to increase the vortex time to longer than 5 minutes at maximum speed. Also, ensure that the maximum input of 200 mg of stool is not exceeded, as this may also cause incomplete homogenization. - An alternative elution buffer was used.
It is recommended that the Elution Buffer B supplied with this kit be used for maximum DNA recovery. - Lysis Additive A was not added to the lysate.
Ensure that the provided Lysis Additive A is added to separate humic acid and increase DNA yield. Also, an incubation can be performed at 65°C for 10 minutes after addition of the Lysis Additive A and prior to vortexing to maximize DNA recovery. - Ethanol was not added to the lysate.
Ensure that an equal amount of ethanol is added to the lysate before binding to the column. - Ethanol was not added to the Wash Solution A.
Ensure that 42 mL of 96 - 100% ethanol is added to the supplied Wash Solution A prior to use.
If the DNA does not perform well in downstream applications, It may be due to one or more of the following:
- Eluted DNA sample is brown.
Ensure that the Lysis Additive A is added. Also ensure Binding Solution I is added to the lysate and that it is incubated on ice for 10 minutes prior to spinning down the lysate. Avoid any contact with the pellet or surface residue when collecting the supernatant after the 5 minute spin during sample preparation. - Lysis Additive A was not added to the lysate.
Ensure that the provided Lysis Additive A is added to the lysate. - DNA was not washed with the provided Binding Buffer C and Wash Solution A.
Traces of salt from the binding step may remain in the sample if the column is not washed three times with the provided Binding Buffer C and Wash Solution A. Salt may interfere with downstream applications, and thus must be washed from the column. - Ethanol carryover.
Ensure that the dry spin under the "Column Wash" procedure is performed, in order to remove traces of ethanol prior to elution. Ethanol is known to interfere with many downstream applications. - Binding Buffer I was not added to the lysate.
Ensure that the Binding Buffer I is added to the lysate and that it is incubated on ice for 10 minutes prior to spinning down the lysate. - PCR reaction conditions need to be optimized.
Take steps to optimize the PCR conditions being used, including varying the amount of template, changing the source of Taq polymerase, looking into the primer design and adjusting the annealing conditions.
Yes, the Stool DNA Isolation Kit is capable of simultaneous extraction of both host DNA and microbial DNA (universal protocol). Please contact our technical support team at support@norgenbiotek.com and ask for reference publications.
Our Stool DNA Isolation Kit has been able to extract all host DNA including mtDNA from difficult samples like stool samples. Please contact our technical support team at support@norgenbiotek.com and ask for reference publications.
Magnetic Bead System
If the magnetic beads were accidently pipetted up with the supernatant, the pipette tip was placed too close to the magnetic beads while pipetting. Simply return the magnetic beads and the supernatant back into the sample well. Mix well, and place the plate back onto the magnetic separation plate for the specified time. Carefully remove the supernatant without touching the magnetic beads
A low genomic DNA yield may be caused by the following:
- Incomplete lysis of cells.
Ensure that Lysis Additive A is added. Also incubation at 65°C may result in increased yields. - Amount of magnetic beads added was not sufficient.
Ensure that the magnetic bead suspension is mixed well prior to use to avoid any inconsistency in DNA isolation. - DNA concentration in the stool sample being used is low.
Some stool samples contain very little target DNA. This varies from individual to individual based on numerous variables. Incubation at 65°C may result in increased yields.
If the DNA does not perform well in downstream applications, It may be due to one or more of the following:
- DNA was not washed with 70% Ethanol.
Traces of salt from the binding step may remain in the sample if the magnetic beads are not washed with 70% Ethanol. Salt may interfere with downstream applications, and thus must be washed from the magnetic beads. - Ethanol carryover.
Ensure that the drying step after the 70% ethanol wash steps is performed, in order to remove traces of ethanol prior to elution. Ethanol is known to interfere with many downstream applications
If RNA is present in eluted DNA, it's because RNA is coeluted with the DNA. Carry out a digestion with RNase A on the elution if the RNA present will interfere with downstream applications. Refer to manufacturer’s instructions regarding amount of enzyme to use, optimal incubation time and temperature.
Citations
Spin Column, High Throughput (27600, 65600)
| Title | Additive effect of probiotics (Mutaflor) on 5-aminosalicylic acid therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis |
| Journal | Korean J Intern Med. 2022. |
| Authors | Soo-Kyung Park, Sang-Bum Kang, SangSoo Kim, Tae Oh Kim, Jae Myung Cha, Jong Pil Im, Chang Hwan Choi, Eun Soo Kim, Geom Seog Seo, Chang Soo Eun, Dong Soo Han, Dong Il Park |
| Title | Trust your guts? The effect of gut section on diet composition and impact of Mus musculus on islands using metabarcoding |
| Journal | Ecology and Evolution. 2022. |
| Authors | Catarina J. Pinho, Evandro P. Lopes, Joana Paupério, Isildo Gomes, Maria M. Romeiras, Raquel Vasconcelos |
| Title | Hyaluronic Acid 35 kDa Protects against a Hyperosmotic, Formula Feeding Model of Necrotizing Enterocolitis |
| Journal | Nutrients. 2022. |
| Authors | Kathryn Burge, Jeffrey Eckert, Adam Wilson, MaJoi Trammell, Shiloh R. Lueschow, Steven J. McElroy, David Dyer and Hala Chaaban |
| Title | Impact of COVID-19 and Antibiotic Treatments on Gut Microbiome: A Role for Enterococcus spp. |
| Journal | Biomedicines. 2022. |
| Authors | Elda Righi, Lorenza Lambertenghi, Anna Gorska, Concetta Sciammarella, Federico Ivaldi, Massimo Mirandola, Assunta Sartor and Evelina Tacconelli |
| Title | Diet of the exotic Madeiran wall lizard: first insights into trophic interactions in an Atlantic seabird sanctuary |
| Journal | Herpetozoa. 2022. |
| Authors | Verónica Neves, Dorothee Rund, Catarina J. Pinho, Raquel Vasconcelos, Paco Bustamante, Petra Quillfeldt |
| Title | Novel microbiome signatures for non-invasive diagnosis of adenoma recurrence after colonoscopic polypectomy |
| Journal | Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2022. |
| Authors | Jessie Qiaoyi Liang, Yao Zeng, Grace Kwok, Chun Pan Cheung, Bing Yee Suen, Jessica Y. L. Ching, Ka Fai To, Jun Yu, Francis K. L. Chan, Siew Chien Ng |
| Title | Stool is a sensitive and noninvasive source of DNA for monitoring expansion in repeat expansion disease mouse models |
| Journal | Dis Model Mech. 2022. |
| Authors | Xiaonan Zhao, Cassandra McHugh, Sydney R. Coffey, Diego Antonio Jimenez, Elizabeth Adams, Jeffrey B. Carroll, Karen Usdin |
| Title | Molecular identification of Eimeria species in Spanish bats |
| Journal | Parasitology International. 2022. |
| Authors | Seila Couso-Pérez, Xosé Pardavila, Elvira Ares-Mazás, Hipólito Gómez-Couso |
| Title | Chronic Morphine Exposure distorts Gut-Brain Interrelationships in SHIV Infected Rhesus Macaques |
| Journal | Research Square. 2022. |
| Authors | Omalla A. Olwenyi, Samuel D. Johnson, Mehdi Bidokhti, Kabita Pandey, Michellie Thurman, Arpan Acharya, Srijayaprakash Uppada, Shannon Callen, Luis Giavedoni, Udaykumar Ranga, Shilpa J. Buch and Siddappa N. Byrareddy |
| Title | Early treatment with anti-α4β7 antibody facilitates increased gut macrophage maturity in SIV-infected rhesus macaques |
| Journal | Front Immunol. 2022. |
| Authors | Samuel D. Johnson, Lindsey A. Knight, Narendra Kumar, Omalla A. Olwenyi, Michellie Thurman, Smriti Mehra, Mahesh Mohan, and Siddappa N. Byrareddy |
| Title | Digging in a 120 years-old lunch: What can we learn from collection specimens of extinct species? |
| Journal | PLOS ONE. 2022 |
| Authors | Catarina J. Pinho, Vicente Roca, Ana Perera, Amanda Sousa, Michèle Bruni, Aurélien Miralles, Raquel Vasconcelos |
| Title | Gut microbiome profiling in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and healthy individuals in Indonesian population |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Sciences. 2022 |
| Authors | Nu’man A S Daud, Nasrul Hadi Akram, Najdah Hidayah, Sri Jayanti, Irda Handayani, Muhammad Nasrum Massi |
| Title | Burden and Epidemiology of Human Intestinal Giardia duodenalis Infection in Colombia: A Systematic Review |
| Journal | Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022 |
| Authors | Carmine Fusaro, Yosef A. Chávez-Romero, Sonia Liliana Gómez Prada, Nancy Serrano-Silva, Jaime E. Bernal, Francisco Erik González-Jiménez and Yohanna Sarria-Guzmán |
| Title | Impact of a probiotic diet on well‐being of healthy senior: THE ROBIOSENIOR PROJECT |
| Journal | Journal of Applied Microbiology. 2022 |
| Authors | Chiara Salvesi, Stefania Silvi, Dennis Fiorini, Serena Scortichini, Gianni Sagratini, Francesco A. Palermo, Renato De Leone, Nadaniela Egidi, Lorella Fatone, Carlo Cifani, Amedeo Amedei, Francesca Scocchera, Mara Morici, Beatrice Gatto, Fausto Mannucci, Valerio Valeriani, Marco Malavasi, Sara Servili, Andrea Casula, Andrea Cresci, Ivano Corradetti, Francesco Carpi, Matteo Picciolini, Maria Magdalena Coman, Maria Cristina Verdenelli |
| Title | Multilocus Sequence Typing helps understand the genetic diversity of Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum isolated from Colombian patients |
| Journal | Plos One. 2022 |
| Authors | Johanna Uran-Velasquez, Juan F. Alzate, Ana E. Farfan-Garcia, Oscar G. Gomez-Duarte, Larry L. Martinez-Rosado, Diego D. Dominguez-Hernandez, Winston Rojas, Ana Luz Galvan-Diaz, Gisela M. Garcia-Montoya |
| Title | Development of a rational framework for the therapeutic efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation for calf diarrhea treatment |
| Journal | Microbiome. 2022 |
| Authors | Islam J, Tanimizu M, Shimizu Y, Goto Y, Ohtani N, Sugiyama K, Tatezaki E, Sato M, Makino E, Shimada T, Ueda C, Matsuo A, Suyama Y, Sakai Y, Furukawa M, Usami K, Yoneyama H, Aso H, Tanaka H, Nochi T |
| Title | Molecular detection and genotyping of intestinal protozoa from different biogeographical regions of Colombia |
| Journal | PeerJ. 2020 |
| Authors | Adriana Higuera, Ximena Villamizar, Giovanny Herrera, Julio Cesar Giraldo, Luis Reinel Vasquez-A, Plutarco Urbano, Oswaldo Villalobos, Catalina Tovar, Juan David Ramírez |
| Title | Molecular and descriptive epidemiology of intestinal protozoan parasites of children and their pets in Cauca, Colombia: a cross-sectional study |
| Journal | BMC Infectious Diseases. 2019 |
| Authors | Ximena Villamizar, Adriana Higuera, Giovanny Herrera, Luis Reinel Vasquez-A, Lorena Buitron, Lina Maria Muñoz, Fabiola E. Gonzalez-C, Myriam Consuelo Lopez, Julio Cesar Giraldo & Juan David Ramírez |
| Title | Gut Microbial Diversity in Antibiotic-Naive Children After Systemic Antibiotic Exposure: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Journal | Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2017. |
| Authors | Thuy Doan, Ahmed M. Arzika, Kathryn J. Ray, Sun Y. Cotter, Jessica Kim, Ramatou Maliki, Lina Zhong, Zhaoxia Zhou, Travis C. Porco, Benjamin Vanderschelden, Jeremy D. Keenan, Thomas M. Lietman |
| Title | Molecular Epidemiology of Giardia, Blastocystis and Cryptosporidium among Indigenous Children from the Colombian Amazon Basin |
| Journal | Frontiers in Microbology. 2017 |
| Authors | Sánchez A, Munoz M, Gómez N, Tabares J, Segura L, Salazar Á, Restrepo C, Ruíz M, Reyes P, Qian Y, Xiao L, López MC, Ramírez JD. |
| Title | A Rabbit Model of Acanthamoeba Keratitis: Use of Infected Soft Contact Lenses After Corneal Epithelium Debridement With a Diamond Burr |
| Journal | Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2017 |
| Authors | Ortillés Á, Goñi P, Rubio E, Sierra M, Gámez E, Fernández MT, Benito M, Cristóbal JÁ, Calvo B. |
| Title | Intestinal microbiota as a tetrahydrobiopterin exogenous source in hph-1 mice |
| Journal | Scientific Reports. 2017. |
| Authors | Belik J, Shifrin Y, Arning E, Bottiglieri T, Pan J, Daigneault MC, Allen-Vercoe E. |
| Title | Exceptional maternal lineage diversity in brown bears (Ursus arctos) from Turkey |
| Journal | Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2016. |
| Authors | F. Gözde Çilingir, Çiğdem Akın Pekşen, Hüseyin Ambarlı, Peter Beerli and C. Can Bilgin |
| Title | Changes on fecal microbiota in rats exposed to permethrin during postnatal development |
| Journal | Environmental Science and Pollution Research International. 2016. |
| Authors | Nasuti C, Coman MM, Olek RA, Fiorini D, Verdenelli MC, Cecchini C, Silvi S, Fedeli D, Gabbianelli R |
| Title | An Independent Evaluation of the CryoXtract Instruments' CXT350 Frozen Sample Aliquotter Using Tissue and Fecal Biospecimens |
| Journal | Biopreservation and Biobanking. 2016. |
| Authors | Mathieson W, Sanchez I, Mommaerts K, Frasquilho S, Betsou F |
| Title | Method Optimization for Fecal Sample Collection and Fecal DNA Extraction |
| Journal | Biopreservation Biobanking. 2015. |
| Authors | Mathay C, Hamot G, Henry E, Georges L, Bellora C, Lebrun L, de Witt B, Ammerlaan W, Buschart A, Wilmes P, Betsou F. |
| Title | Cryptosporidiosis outbreak in a child day-care center caused by an unusual Cryptosporidium hominis subtype |
| Journal | Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. 2015. |
| Authors | Pilar Goñi, Diego Almagro-Nievas, Joanna Cieloszyk, Silvia Lóbez, José María Navarro-Marí, José Gutiérrez-Fernández |
| Title | Detection of Campylobacter in human faecal samples in Fiji |
| Journal | Western Pacific Surveillance and Response Journal. 2014. |
| Authors | Aruna Devi, Jenny Wilkinson, Timothy Mahony and Thiru Vanniasinkam |
| Title | How to make DNA count: DNA-based diagnostic tools in veterinary parasitology. |
| Journal | Veterinary Parasitology. 2011. |
| Authors | Hunt PW, Lello J. |
